Cargill et al v. Bricker et al
| Emily Cargill and Alison Franciscus |
| Michael Bricker and The City of Jacksonville, Florida |
| 3:2026cv01986 |
| August 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Marcy LaHart on behalf of Emily Cargill, Alison Franciscus. Lead Counsel: Marcy LaHart. (LaHart, Marcy) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Michael Bricker, The City of Jacksonville, Florida. (AJS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Jordan Emery Pratt and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:26-cv-1986-JEP-PDB. (AJS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Bricker, City of Jacksonville (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25347693) filed by Emily Cargill, Alison Franciscus. (Attachments: #1 Settlement Agreement, #2 Outcomes Email, #3 8/25/25 letter re settlement violations, #4 8/29/25 Response from City, #5 9/2/25 letter to city re ongoing breach, #6 9/18/25 letter from City, #7 Pre-suit demand, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Proposed Summons, #10 Proposed Summons)(LaHart, Marcy) Modified on 8/4/2026 to edit docket text (AJS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
