Fargas Olivar v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Jose Antonio Fargas Olivar |
| U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Attorney General of the United States and WARDEN, Warden of Florida Baker Correctional Institute |
| 3:2026cv02065 |
| August 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JDR) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Jordan Emery Pratt and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:26-cv-2065-JEP-PDB. (JDR) |
| Filing 1 Verified PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-25382736) filed by Jose Antonio Fargas Olivar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rub, Allison) Modified text on 8/11/2026 (JDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
