Doe v. City of Jacksonville et al
| Jane Doe |
| City of Jacksonville, T.K. Waters and Reginald McKinney |
| 3:2026cv02311 |
| September 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to City of Jacksonville, Reginald McKinney, T.K. Waters. (JVC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Mary Sherris of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JVC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 3:26-cv-02311-WWB-LLL. (JVC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McKinney, T.K. Waters and City of Jacksonville against Jane Doe with Jury Demand filed by Jane Doe. (Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLMDC-25498622) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Summons Jacksonville, #4 Proposed Summons McKinney, #5 Proposed Summons T.K. Waters)(Sherris, Mary) Modified on 9/3/2026 to edit text. (JVC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
