Cubillos Gonzalez v. Warden, North Florida Detention Facility et al. (Baker)
| Nencer Cubillos Gonzalez |
| Acting Secretary Markwayne Mullin, Acting U.S. A.G. Todd Blanche, Warden Baker Correctional Institute and ICE / U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, |
| 3:2026cv02446 |
| September 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens:Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Anny Leon of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JAW) |
| Filing 2 Case Reassigned to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:26-cv-02246-WWB-PDB. (JAW) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus- Federal (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-25569045) filed by Nencer Cubillos Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leon, Anny) Modified Text on 9/18/2026 (JAW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
