Torres Pacheco v. Warden, North Florida Detention Center et al (Baker)
| Ricardo Geovanni Torres Pacheco |
| Todd Blanche, Secretary Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, Matthew Elliston and Warden, North Florida Detention Center |
| 3:2026cv03124 |
| November 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jordan Emery Pratt |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens:Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Caridad Acosta on behalf of Ricardo Geovanni Torres Pacheco. Lead Counsel: CARIDAD ACOSTA, ESQ. (Acosta, Caridad) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Ricardo Geovanni Torres Pacheco. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Acosta, Caridad) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Jordan Emery Pratt and Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 3:26-cv-3124-JEP-LLL. (JDR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-25830333) filed by Ricardo Geovanni Torres Pacheco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT A-I)(Acosta, Caridad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
