United States Department of Labor v. A+ Nursetemps, Inc. et al
| United States Department of Labor |
| A+ Nursetemps, Inc. and Michael J. Arthur |
| 5:2007cv00182 |
| May 4, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Citrus |
| Wm. Terrell Hodges |
| Gary R. Jones |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Parties are directed to meet within twenty (20) days and to confer upon the preparation and submission of an agreed, proposed final judgment and injunction consistent with this opinion. Such submission shall be made within thirty (30) days. Any agreement by either party to the form of the judgment shall not be construed as an agreement with regard to the correctness of the judgment or a waiver of the right to seek r eview of the judgment in whole or in part. If the Parties are unable to agree upon the form and/or amount of the judgment, the Petitioner shall file within thirty (30) days a proposed judgment consistent with this opinion, and the Respondents may have ten (10) days thereafter to file their objections, after which the Court will take the matter under submission. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 4/5/2013. (LRH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
