Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security et al.
Plaintiff: Lorna A. Osborne
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2008cv00347
Filed: August 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Wm. Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: Gary R. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINAL ORDER affirming the decision of the Commissioner and directing the clerk to enter final judgment and close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones on 12/10/2009. (grj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorna A. Osborne
Represented By: N. Albert Bacharach, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?