Henggeler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Adam D. Henggeler
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 5:2010cv00535
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ocala Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Wm. Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: Joel B. Toomey
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Motion to dismiss Amended Complaint. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiffs dismissing 24 the Amended Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 9/19/2011. (LRH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henggeler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam D. Henggeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?