Bermingham v. City of Clermont, Florida et al
Plaintiff: Kyle Bermingham
Defendant: Steve Graham and City of Clermont, Florida
Case Number: 5:2012cv00037
Filed: January 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ocala Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Presiding Judge: Roy B. Dalton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion in Limine; denying 92 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/8/2013. (RTH)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting 75 Defendant's unopposed motion to take deposition of Plaintiff's substitute expert witness and request for continuance of pretrial and trial deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/30/2013. (AR)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 65 Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Leave to Replace Deceased Expert Witness to the extent stated in the Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/19/2013. (AR)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for summary judgment; denying 41 Motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 7/31/2013. (VMF)
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Amend Case Management and Scheduling Order for Extension of Time on Expert Witness Designation & Report. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/30/2013. (AR)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Plaintiff's Stipulated Motion to Amend Case Management and Scheduling Order: Mediation deadline is extended until December 31, 2012; all other deadlines remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 9/24/2012. (AR)
February 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 13 Motion to extend time to respond to petition for preliminary injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 2/16/2012. (Smith, Thomas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bermingham v. City of Clermont, Florida et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Graham
Represented By: John T. Conner
Represented By: Donna Noelle Maloney Hansen
Represented By: Douglas T. Noah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Clermont, Florida
Represented By: Donna Noelle Maloney Hansen
Represented By: John T. Conner
Represented By: Douglas T. Noah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Bermingham
Represented By: Derek B. Brett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?