Naranjo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Petitioner: Jose Naranjo
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Case Number: 5:2014cv00190
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ocala Office
County: Sumter
Presiding Judge: Wm. Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: Philip R. Lammens
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing Petition [Doc. 1] without prejudice; and denying Motion to Vacate Judgment under Alleyne [Doc. 6]. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate all remaining deadlines as moot, and close the file. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 11/2/2016. (SER)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Naranjo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Naranjo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?