Decker v. Citrus County
| George H. Decker |
| Citrus County |
| 5:2015cv00024 |
| January 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Citrus |
| Philip R. Lammens |
| James S. Moody |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/5/2016. (LN)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: Defendant Citrus County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 40 is GRANTED. Counts III, IV, and IX of Plaintiff's complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/25/2016. (LN)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for the Entry of an Order to Show Cause as to Count VIII Petition for the on the Record Review 25 is GRANTED. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall file a response to Count VIII Pet ition for on the Record Review. Within fourteen (14) days after Respondent's response is filed, Petitioner may file a reply not to exceed fifteen (15) pages and a supplemental appendix. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/29/2016. (LN)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER: Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, the parties shall confer and each party may file a memorandum of law addressing whether Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, either in whole or in part, or the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure should govern the adjudication of the petition. The Court DEFERS ruling upon Petitioner's Motion for the Entry of an Order to Show Cause as to Count VIII Petition for the on the Record Review 25 until this issue has been addressed by the parties. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/2/2016. (LN)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: Defendant Citrus County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ( 27 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count III is DISMISSED without prejudice. Count IV is abated until Plaintiff's claim for inverse condemnation has been fully adjudicated. Count VI is DISMISSED in part. Count IX is DISMISSED without prejudice. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies noted above. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/10/2015. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Decker v. Citrus County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George H. Decker | |
| Represented By: | Luke Charles Lirot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Citrus County | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Roper |
| Represented By: | Dale A. Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
