State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Stone et al
State Farm Life Insurance Company |
Michelle Mizell Stone and Kyle Stone |
5:2015cv00267 |
May 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ocala Office |
Lake |
Philip R. Lammens |
James S. Moody |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER: State Farm Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Interpleader 20 is GRANTED. State Farm Life Insurance Company is discharged from any liability to Michelle Mizell Stone, Ryan Stone, and Kyle Stone in connection with insura nce policy LF-1449-4120 or any benefits under that policy. Michelle Mizell Stone, Ryan Stone, and Kyle Stone are hereby enjoined from instituting any action against State Farm Insurance Company in any state or federal court with respect to insuranc e policy LF-1449-4120 or any benefits under that policy. State Farm Insurance Company is DISMISSED from the action. Defendants are directed to plead and pursue their claims among themselves in connection with their respective rights and claims to t he insurance proceeds. For pleading purposes, Kyle Stone will now be designated as Plaintiff. After State Farm Insurance Company is dismissed as Plaintiff, the Clerk is directed to realign the parties in accordance with this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/9/2015. (LN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.