Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Petitioner: Steven M. Chapman
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Case Number: 5:2017cv00040
Filed: February 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ocala Office
County: Sumter
Presiding Judge: Wm. Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: Philip R. Lammens
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DENYING Petition 1. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the case. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 1/22/2020. (CLF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven M. Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?