Dakota Swope-Kreiser v. Blitchton Marathon Inc. et al
Dakota Swope-Kreiser |
Blitchton Marathon Inc. and Alvaro Ocejo |
5:2017cv00235 |
May 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ocala Office |
Marion |
Philip R. Lammens |
James S. Moody |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: Defendant Alvaro Ocejo's Amended Answer 12 is STRICKEN. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 11 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter a Final Default Judgment in the amount of $7,280 in favor of Plaintiff Dako ta Swope-Kreiser, and against Defendants Blitchton Marathon Inc. and Alvaro Ocejo, bearing interest at the statutory rate. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/25/2017. (LN) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Defendant Alvaro Ocejo's Answer 4 is STRICKEN. Defendant Alvaro Ocejo has forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order to file an amended answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Defendant Blitchton Marathon Inc. has for ty-five (45) days from the date of this Order to obtain counsel and respond to the Complaint. Failure to do so will result in the Court entering a default against Defendant Blitchton Marathon Inc. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/22/2017. (LN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.