Rafferty v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. et al
| Cheryl Rafferty |
| Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and John Does 1-25 |
| 5:2017cv00426 |
| September 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Marion |
| Paul G. Byron |
| Philip R. Lammens |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER adopting 132 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 130 MOTION for Taxation of Costs filed by Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. The Motion to Tax Costs on Behalf of Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. (Doc. 130) is GRANTED in the amount of $764.45. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 4/16/2019. (MMW)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER adopting 127 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 113 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc., 112 Amended MOTION for summary judgment filed by Cheryl Rafferty. Plaintiff' s Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 112) is DENIED. The Motion and Supporting Brief for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. (Doc. 113) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class Certification (Doc. 98) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and against Cheryl Rafferty, and to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/4/2019. (MMW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
