Hart v. Auburndale Police Department et al
| Randy Allen Hart |
| Auburndale Police Department, Horace Anderson and David Oros |
| 5:2018cv00425 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Polk |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRANSFER to Tampa Division and assigned case number 8:18-cv-2117-T-23AEP. (HAQ) |
Filing 5
ORDER transferring case to Tampa Division for all further proceedings. The Clerk is directed to forward the file to that Division. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 8/23/2018. (CRR)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/14/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (page 7) by Randy Allen Hart. (MJT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Horace Anderson, David Oros, Auburndale Police Department filed by Randy Allen Hart. (No service copies provided.)(MJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
