Nickell v. LaSalle et al
Plaintiff: David Leon Nickell
Defendant: AT&T and James LaSalle
Case Number: 5:2018cv00443
Filed: August 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/20/2018. (AD)
September 19, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to file a document and accept as timely filed. OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by David Leon Nickell. (HAQ) Modified on 9/19/2018 (HAQ).
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: adopting #4 The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/18/2018. (AD)
September 17, 2018 Mail returned as Attempted not Known to David Leon Nickell re: #3 Related case order and track 2 notice, #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Leon Nickell. Updated address and re-mailed. (HAQ)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Leon Nickell. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/30/2018. (SC)
August 27, 2018 Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 8/27/2018. (AD)
August 22, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Leon Nickell. (no forms provided) (LMF) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
August 22, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T and James LaSalle with Jury Demand filed by David Leon Nickell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nickell v. LaSalle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Leon Nickell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James LaSalle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?