Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Maria De Los Angeles Navarro |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 5:2018cv00473 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FEES paid by Maria De Los Angeles Navarro (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number OCA-9640). (HAQ) |
Filing 5
ORDER taking under advisement #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency: Plaintiff may, on or before September 26, 2018, file an amended sworn affidavit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 9/13/2018. (SC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/11/2018. (Copy electronically transmitted to Counsel.) (MLS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway. (MJT)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Maria De Los Angeles Navarro. (MJT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (No service forms provided.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Maria De Los Angeles Navarro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
