Gaynes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff: David M. Gaines and David M. Gaynes
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2018cv00527
Filed: October 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Filing 12 TRANSFER to Orlando Division and assigned case number 6:18-cv-1963-Orl-22-GJK. (HAQ)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida. The Clerk is then directed to administratively close the case in the Ocala Division. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/14/2018. (SMB)
November 13, 2018 Filing 10 CONSENT DECREE by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Gobel, Dale)
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendant shall SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen (14) days of this Order why the Court should not transfer this case to the Orlando Division. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/9/2018. (SMB)
November 8, 2018 Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to remand to State Court filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Concepcion, Michelle)
October 29, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to remand to State Court by David M. Gaines. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Martin, W.)
October 25, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice by David M. Gaines. (Martin, W.)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by David M. Gaines. Related case(s): No (Martin, W.)
October 18, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent State Farm Fire, Corporate Parent State Farm General Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Corporate Parent State Farm, Corporate Parent State Farm Florida Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Lloyds, Corporate Parent State Farm County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, Corporate Parent State Farm Bank, F.S.B., Corporate Parent State Farm VP Management Corp., Corporate Parent State Farm Investment Management Corp., Corporate Parent State Farm Life and Accident Assurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Guaranty Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Indemnity Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Indemnity Company, Corporate Parent Oglesby Reinsurance Ltd., Corporate Parent Insurance Placement Services, Inc., Corporate Parent State Farm International Services, Inc., Corporate Parent State Farm Finance Corporation of Canada, Corporate Parent State Farm Finance Corporation of Canada, Corporate Parent State Farm International Life Insurance Company Ltd., Corporate Parent State Farm Annuity and Life Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Annuity and Life Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Farm Funding Corp., Corporate Parent State Farm Funding Corp., Corporate Parent State Farm Investor Services (Canada) Holding Company, Corporate Parent Top Layer Reinsurance Ltd., Corporate Parent SF Insurance Placement Corporation of Canada for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.. (Gobel, Dale)
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Related case(s): yes (Gobel, Dale)
October 11, 2018 Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 issued by Deputy Clerk on 10/11/2018. (SMB)
October 11, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, case number 2017-CA-9035 filed in State Court on 10/11/2017. Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number OCA-9692 filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A, B, C, & D to Notice of Removal, #2 Complaint from State Court, #3 Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #4 Reply to Affirmative Defenses, #5 State Record, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(MLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaynes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By: Michelle Evans Concepcion
Represented By: Dale T. Gobel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M. Gaines
Represented By: W. Doug Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M. Gaynes
Represented By: W. Doug Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?