Croyle v. Citrus Primary Care, Inc.
| Leslie Croyle |
| Citrus Primary Care, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00535 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/21/2019, Dispositive motions due by 10/4/2019, Pretrial Conference set for TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr., Jury Trial set for FEBRUARY 2020 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 12/20/2018. (AD)
|
| Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Terry, Scott) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Citrus Primary Care, Inc.(Del Russo, Alexander) Modified on 11/27/2018 (HAQ). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Quincy Bird on behalf of Citrus Primary Care, Inc. (Bird, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Consented Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Citrus Primary Care, Inc.'s answer or response is due buy November 26, 2018. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/14/2018. (SMB)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Citrus Primary Care, Inc.. (Del Russo, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander David Del Russo on behalf of Citrus Primary Care, Inc. (Del Russo, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Leslie Croyle. Related case(s): yes (Terry, Scott) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on October 25, 2018 by Leslie Croyle as to Citrus Primary Care, Inc.. (Terry, Scott) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Citrus Primary Care, Inc.. (LAB) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 10/23/2018. (AD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:18-cv-535-Oc-30PRL. (NAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citrus Primary Care, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14737436) filed by Leslie Croyle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Terry, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Croyle v. Citrus Primary Care, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Citrus Primary Care, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alexander David Del Russo |
| Represented By: | Robert Quincy Bird |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leslie Croyle | |
| Represented By: | Scott L. Terry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
