Natar v. Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC et al
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Natar
Defendant: Quan Nguyen and Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC
Case Number: 5:2018cv00562
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim by Reynaldo Natar. (Richards, Jordan) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. Modified on 12/27/2018 (RLK).
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 12/18/2018. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(SMB)
December 13, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against All Defendants by Quan Nguyen, Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC.(Blanchfield, Robert)
November 29, 2018 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Reynaldo Natar.(Richards, Jordan) Modified on 11/30/2018 (LAB). Modified on 11/30/2018 (LAB).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' answer or response is due December 7, 2018. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/29/2018. (SMB)
November 28, 2018 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by All Defendants. (Blanchfield, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
November 6, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC, Quan Nguyen. (LAB)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:18-cv-562-Oc-30PRL. (NAS)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14788758) filed by Reynaldo Natar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC, #3 Proposed Summons Quan Nguyen)(Richards, Jordan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Natar v. Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Natar
Represented By: Jordan Lee Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quan Nguyen
Represented By: Robert E. Blanchfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duct-Man Mechanical Services LLC
Represented By: Robert E. Blanchfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?