Holmes v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
| Janette Holmes |
| Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. |
| 5:2018cv00573 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Janette Holmes. Related case(s): yes (DeGisi, Carmen) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.. (LAB) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 11/13/2018. (AD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:18-cv-573-Oc-30PRL. (SMS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14807098) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Merck Summons, #2 Proposed Summons MSD Summons, #3 Proposed Summons McKesson Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CCS Holmes, Janette)(DeGisi, Carmen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
