Robinson v. Valocha et al
| Roylin James Robinson |
| FNU Dyer, FNU Frizzer, Dr Mesa Valocha, Dr. W. Noel, FNU Peters, FNU Rodriguez, FNU Vesta, Criterion, Inc and Centurion |
| 5:2018cv00597 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Marcia Morales Howard |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Judge Marcia Morales Howard. New case number: 5:18-cv-597-Oc-34PRL. Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges no longer assigned to the case. (SMS) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/29/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Roylin James Robinson. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Criterion, Inc, FNU Dyer, FNU Frizzer, W. Noel, FNU Peters, FNU Rodriguez, Mesa Valocha, FNU Vesta filed by Roylin James Robinson. (no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
