Cataldi v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Anthony Cataldi |
Amica Mutual Insurance Company |
5:2019cv00176 |
April 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Philip R Lammens |
James S Moody |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 4/22/2020; Dispositive motions due by 5/20/2020; Pretrial Conference set for THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2020 at 10:15 AM in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr. Jury Trial set for the DECEMBER 2020 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/15/2019. (KAC) |
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Vaughn, Madeleine) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Amended Motion for Extension of Time for the Case Management Report. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/30/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 8 AMENDED MOTION to extend time to complete CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Vaughn, Madeleine) Modified on 4/30/2019 (LAB). |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time for the Case Management Report (Dkt. #6) is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/30/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 6 First MOTION to extend time to CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Vaughn, Madeleine) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Vaughn, Madeleine) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. Related case(s):no (Vaughn, Madeleine) Modified on 4/25/2019 (RLK). |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 4/10/2019. (AC) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-176-Oca-30PRL. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fifth Judicial Circuit of Marion County, case number 2019-CA-0441 filed in State Court on 02/26/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15331827 filed by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 State Court Other Documents)(Vaughn, Madeleine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cataldi v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Anthony Cataldi | |
Represented By: | Jason Paul Herman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Madeleine Camille Vaughn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.