Gasperak v. Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC et al
| Douglas Gasperak |
| Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC, DPN USA, LLC and DPN USA, LLC doing business as Healthfair |
| 5:2019cv00206 |
| April 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED NOTICE of filing and serving response re #8 FLSA scheduling order by DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC (Schifino, John) Modified on 6/25/2019 (RLK). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of filing and serving Documents in Response re #8 FLSA scheduling order by DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC (Schifino, John) Modified on 6/25/2019 (RLK). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to court interrogatories by Douglas Gasperak. (Lechner, Jay) |
| ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Lawrence J. Friedman, appearing on behalf of DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA056650.) Related document: #5 Unopposed MOTION for Lawrence J. Friedman and Ernest Leonard to appear pro hac vice. (ARC) |
| ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Ernest Leonard, appearing on behalf of DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA056650.) Related document: #5 Unopposed MOTION for Lawrence J. Friedman and Ernest Leonard to appear pro hac vice. (ARC) |
Filing 8
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(SMB)
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER: The Unopposed Motion for Admission of Lawrence J. Friedman and Ernest Leonard to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants #5 is granted contingent upon payment of the pro hac fees to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/15/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC.(Schifino, John) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Lawrence J. Friedman and Ernest Leonard to appear pro hac vice by DPN USA, LLC, Matrix Medical Network of Florida, LLC. (Schifino, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' answer or response is due by May 15, 2019. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/2/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal Complaint by All Defendants. (Schifino, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-206-Oca-30PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from In the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and for Citrus County, Florida, Civil Division, case number 2019-CA-00026A filed in State Court on 03/08/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15392326 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schifino, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
