White v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. et al
Daniel White |
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. and Viasat, Inc. |
5:2019cv00319 |
July 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Philip R Lammens |
James S Moody |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to Viasat, Inc. This cause is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Viasat, Inc. The Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Viasat, Inc. from this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/26/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Daniel White (Hindi, Jibrael) |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/8/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Viasat, Inc. (LAB) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (LAB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-319-Orl-30PRL. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc., Viasat, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15651861) filed by Daniel White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Hindi, Jibrael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.