DiStefano v. State Of Florida (Marion County)
| John DiStefano |
| State Of Florida |
| 5:2019cv00358 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED PETITION by a State prisoner for writ of habeas corpus filed by John DiStefano. ( no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall complete and file the 2254 habeas corpus form. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a blank 2254 habeas corpus form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 9/11/2019. (CRR)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by John DiStefano. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 8 TRANSFER IN from Ft.Myers Division on 08/01/2019 Case Number 2:19-cv-523. Case assigned to District Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New Case Number: 5:19-cv-358-Oc-41PRL. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (RLK) |
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER transferring case to Ocala. New Case Number is 5:19-cv-358-Oc-41PRL. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/1/2019. (SLU)
|
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 8/13/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate (submitted as a two-sided pleading for filing & NDFL form) by John DiStefano. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (submitted as a two-sided pleading for filing & NDFL form) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John DiStefano. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 PETITION (submitted as a two-sided pleading for filing) for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Civil Detainee filed by John DiStefano. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DiStefano v. State Of Florida (Marion County) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State Of Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John DiStefano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
