Smeko v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
Charles Lee Semko |
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
5:2019cv00480 |
September 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Philip R Lammens |
Mary S Scriven |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Petitioner within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this Order, Petitioner shall either submit the $5.00 filing fee or complete and file the enclosed Affidavit of Indigency. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a blank Affidavit of Indigency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/25/2019. (CRR) |
FEES paid by Charles Lee Semko (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number Oca-10680) (HAI) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Charles Lee Semko. Related case(s): no. (RLK) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(LMF) |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/18/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 10/4/2019. (MR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State filed by Charles Lee Semko.((No fees paid, two service copies provided) (HAI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.