Rosen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: James Howard Rosen
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 5:2019cv00516
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF of service by James Howard Rosen as to the Office of Regional Counsel. (LAB)
November 1, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF of service by James Howard Rosen as to the Office of the Attorney General. (LAB)
November 1, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by James Howard Rosen. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/25/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (LAB)
October 22, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RLK)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing Plaintiff to submit all service documents on or before October 31, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/17/2019. (SA)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway .(LAB)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by James Howard Rosen. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 10/7/2019. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-516-Oc-18PRL. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (SJB)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Howard Rosen. (Berger, Erik)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by James Howard Rosen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Berger, Erik)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Howard Rosen
Represented By: Erik William Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?