Dizeo v. Lake County Detention Center et al
| Vincent N Dizeo |
| Lake County Detention Center and Well Path |
| 5:2020cv00024 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER denying without prejudice #6 Motion to appoint counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 2/5/2020. (CRR)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Vincent N Dizeo. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of change of address by Vincent N Dizeo. (Did not update address PCI) (RLK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Vincent N Dizeo. Related case(s): yes. (RLK) |
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/30/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/16/2020. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lake County Detention Center, Well Path filed by Vincent N Dizeo. (no fees paid, no service copies provided)(RLK) (RLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
