Barnett v. United States Of America
Petitioner: Mark Charles Barnett
Respondent: United States Of America
Case Number: 5:2020cv00115
Filed: March 23, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy B Dalton
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 Motion to Strike. The Government's response is due on or before June 30, 2020 as previously Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/20/2020. (CRR)
May 11, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION to Strike #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 5:17-cr-20-Oc-37PRL by United States of America. (Bodnar, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
April 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/16/2020. (CRR)
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying #6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/14/2020. (CRR)
April 10, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Seal Unredacted motion re: #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) by Mark Charles Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Redacted 2255)(HAI) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
April 3, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis titled "Informa Pauperis Declaration" by Mark Charles Barnett. (HAI) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (HAI).
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing the Government within 90 DAYS from the date of this Order, file a response indicating why the relief sought in the motion should not be granted. Petitioner may have 30 DAYS following service of the Government's response to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/1/2020. (CRR) Modified on 4/2/2020 (CRR).
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/1/2020. (CRR)
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
March 23, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mark Charles Barnett. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
March 23, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 5:17-cr-20-Oc-37PRL filed by Mark Charles Barnett. (2 service copies provided)(RLK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Represented By: Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Charles Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?