Joynt v. Claxton et al
| Robert L Joynt |
| FNU Claxton and Lake County Sheriff Office |
| 5:2020cv00179 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (LAB) |
Filing 6
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and directing Clerk to enter judgment, terminate pending motions, and close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 6/4/2020. (CCB)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Robert L Joynt. ***Signed by Plaintiff only (HAI) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Robert L Joynt. Related case(s): No (HAI) |
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 4/29/2020. (SAO)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Claxton, Lake County Sheriff Office filed by Robert L Joynt. (no fees paid, no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
