Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
| Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc. |
| The Hanover Insurance Company |
| 5:2020cv00201 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Case Management Report. In accordance with the Court's Related Case Order and Track Two Notice, the parties shall meet within 45 days after service of the complaint upon Defendant or the first appearance of Defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/19/2020. (SMB)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Case Management Report by Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc.. (Sanchez, Gilberto) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default (Dkt. #7) is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/18/2020. (SMB)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Clerk's Default against The Hanover Insurance Company by Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sanchez, Gilberto) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on May 8, 2020 by Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc. as to The Hanover Insurance Company. (Sanchez, Gilberto) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc.. Related case(s): no (Sanchez, Gilberto) |
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/26/2020. (KAC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to The Hanover Insurance Company. (LAB) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:20-cv-201-Oc-30PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Hanover Insurance Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16778390) filed by Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A(1), #4 Exhibit A(2), #5 Exhibit A(3), #6 Exhibit A(4), #7 Exhibit A(5), #8 Exhibit B, #9 Exhibit C)(Sanchez, Gilberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tack Shack of Ocala, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gilberto Eduardo Sanchez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Hanover Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
