Wright v. Cheatham et al
Marcus Wright |
Roy Cheatham and William Barr |
5:2020cv00232 |
May 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Philip R Lammens |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk shall close this case and send Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/15/2020. (CRR) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK) |
Filing 3 TRANSFER IN from Tampa Division on 05/27/2020 Case Number 8:20-cv-1194. Case assigned to District Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New Case Number: 5:20-cv-232-Oc-33PRL. (RLK) |
Filing 2 ORDER transferring case to the Ocala division for all further proceedings. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 5/26/2020. (SRC) |
Filing 1 EMERGENCY MOTION for Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Marcus Wright. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Mailing Envelope, #4 11th Circuit's Cover Letter to USDC)(AG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.