Senior v. Coleman II Administration et al
| Mario A Senior |
| FNU Chavis, Coleman II Administration, FNU Summerfield and FNU Barker |
| 5:2020cv00349 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File affidavit of indigency and inmate account statement - due date now October 1, 2020. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/31/2020. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Affidavit of Indigency and Inmate Account Statement by Mario A Senior. (LAB) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying without prejudice #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Please follow the rules pursuant to the standing order you have been provided. That standing order is clear, and sets forth the requirements to get your case started. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/12/2020. (Jung, William)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Mario A Senior. (RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
