Stevens v. Lammens
| Brandon Jordan Stevens |
| Philip R. Lammens |
| 5:2020cv00608 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE to the Court by Brandon Jordan Stevens. (RLK) |
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT entered. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RLK) |
Filing 11
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of the defendant, and close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/26/2021. (MEH) Copies mailed.
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/26/2021. (MEH) Copies mailed.
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of change of address by Brandon Jordan Stevens (HAI) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Recusal and Venue Change by Brandon Jordan Stevens. (RLK) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Philip R. Lammens filed by Brandon Jordan Stevens. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Brandon Jordan Stevens. (no service copies provided)(RLK) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Brandon Jordan Stevens. Related case(s): yes. (RLK) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of service titled " Notice of Designation" by Brandon Jordan Stevens re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice. (RLK) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 12/22/2020. (MEH) Copies mailed.
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/5/2021. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 12/22/2020. (MEH) Copies mailed.
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Brandon Jordan Stevens. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified on 12/21/2020 (RLK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Philip R. Lammens filed by Brandon Jordan Stevens. (no service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RLK) Modified on 12/21/2020 (RLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stevens v. Lammens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Philip R. Lammens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandon Jordan Stevens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
