Philippeaux v. Hernandez Covington et al
Philander Philippeaux |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington, William P. Barr and Philip R. Lammens |
5:2021cv00006 |
January 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Embry J Kidd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FEES paid by Philander Philippeaux (Filing fee $2.00 receipt number OCA-11719) (RLK) |
Filing 6 PROOF of service by Philander Philippeaux. (RLK) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/13/2021. (GNB) copies mailed |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Virginia M Hernandez Covington, Philip R. Lammens, William P. Barr and U.S. Attorney General. (LAB) |
FEES paid by Philander Philippeaux (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number OCA-11688) Balance due $2.00 (LAB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Philander Philippeaux. Related case(s): yes. (LAB) (LAB). Modified on 1/13/2021 (LAB). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for a Three Court Judge by Philander Philippeaux. (RLK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William P. Barr, Virginia M Hernandez Covington, Philip R. Lammens filed by Philander Philippeaux. (no fees paid, no service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Index)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.