Londers v. Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: Holly Londers
Defendant: Intel Corporation
Case Number: 5:2021cv00182
Filed: March 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER terminating as moot #14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss due to the filing of the Amended Complaint at Dkt. #19. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/24/2021. (SMB)
May 21, 2021 Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Intel Corporation with Jury Demand. filed by Holly Londers.(Gold, Christopher) Modified on 5/24/2021 (RLK).
May 13, 2021 Set scheduling order deadlines per Dkt. #18: Conduct mediation hearing by 5/23/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. (KAC)
May 7, 2021 Set/reset scheduling order deadlines: Joinder of Parties due by 6/28/2021 Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 3/28/2022 Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 2/28/2022. (RLK)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 5/23/2022; Dispositive motions due by 5/23/2022; Pretrial Conference set for THURSDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2022, at 10:15 AM in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody, Jr. Jury Trial set on the JANUARY 2023 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody, Jr. Conduct mediation hearing by 5/23/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/6/2021. (KAC) Modified on 5/13/2021 to correct mediation hearing deadline(KAC).
May 5, 2021 Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Shamis, Andrew)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/5/2021. (JWM)
May 4, 2021 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Holly Londers. (Shamis, Andrew)
April 30, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix)(Williams, Aaron)
April 30, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION for Harrison L. Owens to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-18201061 for $150 by Intel Corporation. (Williams, Aaron) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
April 30, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Samantha K. Sondag to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-18200833 for $150 by Intel Corporation. (Williams, Aaron) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
April 29, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew John Shamis on behalf of Holly Londers (Shamis, Andrew)
March 30, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Vanessa S. Power to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-18062348 for $150 and Attached Designation of Local Counsel by Intel Corporation. (Krimsky, Beth-Ann) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
March 29, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (SMB)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to April 30, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/29/2021. (SMB)
March 29, 2021 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal to Plaintiff's Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Williams, Aaron)
March 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Chagas Gold on behalf of Holly Londers (Gold, Christopher)
March 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Adam Edelsberg on behalf of Holly Londers (Edelsberg, Scott)
March 26, 2021 Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:21-cv-0182-JSM-PRL. (SJB)
March 26, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Intel Corporation. (Williams, Aaron)
March 26, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Santiago Hiraldo on behalf of Holly Londers (Hiraldo, Manuel)
March 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from In the Circuit Court for the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and For Lake County, Florida, case number 35-2021-CA-00301 filed in State Court on 02/17/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-18051004 filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Filings, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of Scott Pearce, #6 Exhibit F Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Krimsky, Beth-Ann)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Londers v. Intel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly Londers
Represented By: Manuel Santiago Hiraldo
Represented By: Scott Adam Edelsberg
Represented By: Christopher Chagas Gold
Represented By: Andrew John Shamis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intel Corporation
Represented By: Beth-Ann E. Krimsky
Represented By: Aaron T. Williams
Represented By: Vanessa Soriano Power
Represented By: Harrison L Owens
Represented By: Samantha K. Sondag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?