Schlegel v. Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc. et al
Lawrence Schlegel |
Michael A. Hartman and Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc. |
5:2021cv00192 |
April 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Philip R Lammens |
James S Moody |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Or to Serve A Responsive Pleading) by Michael A. Hartman, Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc.. (Andrews, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on April 27, 2021 by Lawrence Schlegel as to Michael A. Hartman. (De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on April 27, 2021 by Lawrence Schlegel as to Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc.. (De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Michael A. Hartman, Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc.. (LAB) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:21-cv-0192-JSM-PRL. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael A. Hartman, Hartman Civil Construction Company, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-18072260) filed by Lawrence Schlegel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Hartman Civil Constrcution Company, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Michael A. Hartman)(De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.