Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc et al v. Kurowski et al
Alyssia Benford, Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, John Kraft and Kirk Alen |
ILReporter, LLC, Fight for IL, INC, Erik Phelps and Bonnie Kurowski |
5:2021cv00302 |
June 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Philip R Lammens |
James S Moody |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Fight for IL, INC, ILReporter, LLC, Bonnie Kurowski, Erik Phelps. (RLK) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kirk Alen, Alyssia Benford, Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, John Kraft. (Hanlon, Robert) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kirk Alen, Alyssia Benford, Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, John Kraft. (Hanlon, Robert) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kirk Alen, Alyssia Benford, Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, John Kraft. (Hanlon, Robert) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kirk Alen, Alyssia Benford, Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, John Kraft. (Hanlon, Robert) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Robert T. Hanlon, appearing on behalf of Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, Kirk Alen, John Kraft, and Alyssia Benford (Filing fee $150 receipt number OCA-11966.) Related document: #2 MOTION for Robert T. Hanlon to appear pro hac vice. (RLK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Robert T. Hanlon to appear pro hac vice.. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fight for IL, INC, ILReporter, LLC, Bonnie Kurowski, Erik Phelps with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number OCA-11965 filed by Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc, Kirk Alen, Alyssia Benford, John Kraft. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.