Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
| Carlos Miguel Perez |
| Federal Bureau of Prison, Doctor Lee, Clinical Director Marchan and Warden J. M. Henger |
| 5:2021cv00492 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Case by Carlos Miguel Perez. (RLK) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order and failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to deny as moot any pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/5/2021. (KLM)
|
| Filing 4 TRANSFER IN from Orlando Division on 09/28/2021 Case Number 3:21-cv-949-BJD-MCR. Case assigned to District Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New Case Number: 5:21-cv-492-SPC-PRL. (RLK) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 9/28/2021. (RLK)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER transferring this case to the Ocala Division of this Court; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 9/27/2021. (CAW)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Prison, J. M. Henger, Lee, Marchan filed by Carlos Miguel Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(KEM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
