Parks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Darrell James Parks |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
| 5:2021cv00510 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re #4 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Darrell James Parks. (LAB) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 21 days of the date of this Order petitioner shall complete and file the 2241 habeas corpus form and provide three identical service copies. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a blank 2241 habeas corpus from. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/1/2021. (RLK)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/18/2021. (LAB) (LAB).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Darrell James Parks. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Inquiry, #2 Mailing Envelope)(TNP) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Darrell James Parks. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Mailing Envelope)(TNP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
