Gayden v. Lane
| John Matthew Gayden, Jr. |
| Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General |
| 5:2022cv00104 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RLK) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/10/2022. (KLM)
|
| Filing 4 TRANSFER IN from Tampa Division on 02/23/2022 Case Number 8:22-cv-390. Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizell and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New Case Number: 5:22-cv-104-KKM-PRL. (HAI) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 2/24/2022. (RLK)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER transferring case to the Ocala division. The Clerk is directed to transfer the action and close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/18/2022. (SRC)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Matthew Gayden, Jr. (Filing Fee not paid. No IFP Motion Filed.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
