Keys v. Ochs
| Robert Keys |
| Kevin Ochs |
| 5:2022cv00122 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/reset scheduling order deadlines: Joinder of Parties due by 6/10/2022 Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 11/25/2022 Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 10/28/2022. (RLK) |
Filing 12
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/31/2023; Dispositive motions due by 4/14/2023; Pretrial Conference is set for THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2023, at 9:30 A.M. in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr. Jury Trial is set on the JANUARY 2024 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 17 before Judge James S. Moody Jr. Conduct mediation hearing by 4/14/2023. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/18/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Biondi, Gerald) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kevin Ochs.(Biondi, Gerald) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Gerald C. Biondi on behalf of Kevin Ochs. Lead Counsel: Gerald C. Biondi. (Biondi, Gerald) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER striking pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(a) Consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #7) filed by Robert Keys. Consent forms shall only be filed if all parties unanimously consent to disposition of the case or motion by a United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/10/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Robert Keys. (Kronick, Steven) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Robert Keys. (Kronick, Steven) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Robert Keys. Related case(s): No (Kronick, Steven) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:22-cv-0122-JSM-PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion County, case number 2022-CA-00043 filed in State Court on 01/12/2022. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-19303705 filed by Kevin Ochs. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Complaint State Court, #2 State Court Docket Sheet State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Biondi, Gerald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keys v. Ochs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Keys | |
| Represented By: | Steven A. Kronick |
| Represented By: | Steven Adam Kronick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kevin Ochs | |
| Represented By: | Gerald C. Biondi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
