Gayden v. Clements et al
Defendant: Stephen Clements and US Attorney General
Petitioner: M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr. and John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Case Number: 5:2022cv00171
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Brian J Davis
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered dismissing case without prejudice. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (HAI)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; granting #6 Plaintiff's letter request to voluntarily dismiss this case; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 5/17/2022. (CAW)
May 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE to Respondent Attorney by John Matthew Gayden, Jr re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (HAI)
May 16, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss Case by John Matthew Gayden, Jr. (HAI)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to file amended complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. The Clerk shall forward Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form marked "Amended Complaint." Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/29/2022. (KLM)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee. Plaintiff is assessed the total $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the supervisor, inmate trust funds at plaintiff's current place of incarceration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/28/2022. (KLM)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/1/2022. (HAI)
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by John Matthew Gayden, Jr. (HAI) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Clements, US Attorney General filed by John Matthew Gayden, Jr. (No service copies provided) (HAI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gayden v. Clements et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?