Agustin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
| Abraham A Agustin and Abraham A Augustin |
| Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium |
| 5:2022cv00190 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for the case to be held in abeyance only if petitioner has not met the saving clause by Abraham A Augustin. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 5 MOTION for leave to conduct Discovery by Abraham A Agustin. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Abraham A Agustin. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| FEES Paid by Abraham A Agustin (Filing fee $5.00, Receipt Number OCA-12446). (LAB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Abraham A Agustin of intent to pay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (LAB) Modified on 4/26/2022 (LAB). (LAB). |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/12/2022. (LAB)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Abraham A Agustin. (No fees paid no service copies provided)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
