Peacock v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
| Nicholas George Peacock |
| Warden, FCC Coleman II |
| 5:2022cv00224 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT entered. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RLK) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #6 request for extension of time, granting #6 motion to dismiss without prejudice; dismissing the case without prejudice, with instructions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/24/2022. (LDO)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay the case titled "Motion to Dismiss without prejudice or extend time" by Nicholas George Peacock. (RLK) |
|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File an amended complaint on the proper civil rights complaint form and all necessary financial paperwork, whether a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee in full. Both are due no later than June 17, 2022. Failure to file will result in dismissal without further notice. Additionally, all future filings must be signed and dated by Plaintiff or they will be struck. Lastly, Plaintiff poses several legal questions to the Court, but the Court may not provide legal advice to litigants or act in an advocacy role. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/2/2022. (Mizelle, Kathryn)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File amended complaint by Nicholas George Peacock. (RLK) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER to strike #1 Complaint filed by Nicholas George Peacock. To proceed in this action, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint and use the standard prisoner civil rights form by 5/24/2022. Plaintiff must also pay the $402.00 filing fee or file a complete Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate form by 5/24/2022.The Clerk must send to Plaintiff a Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate form and a prisoner civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/10/2022. (KLM)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/9/2022. (RLK)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Warden, FCC Coleman II ****STRICKEN PER ORDER SEE DE 3*** filed by Nicholas George Peacock. (no fees paid, no service copies provided)(RLK) Modified on 5/10/2022 (RLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peacock v. Warden, FCC Coleman II | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas George Peacock | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden, FCC Coleman II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
