Notz v. Trump et al
| Arthur M. Notz, III |
| Donald Trump, The People and The State of Florida |
| 5:2022cv00239 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to The State of Florida and Donald Trump. (LAB) |
REFUND in the amount of $98.00 paid to Arthur Notz, III as per order dated 5/25/22 and signed by Judge Lammens. (JSR)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Arthur M. Notz, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 7/6/2022. (SA) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Finance Department to process a refund of $98.00 for Plaintiff's overpayment of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/25/2022. (SA)
|
| FEES Paid by Arthur M. Notz, III (Filing fee $500.00, Receipt Number OCA-12468). (Chambers and Orlando Finance Notified of overpayment. (LAB) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/20/2022. (LAB)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The People, The State of Florida, Donald Trump filed by Arthur M. Notz, III. (No service copies provided)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
