Campbell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
John William Campbell |
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
5:2022cv00255 |
June 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Philip R Lammens |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Petitioner has 45 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(RLK) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/2/2022. (KLM) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/1/2022. (HAI) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by John William Campbell. Related case(s): Yes (HAI) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John William Campbell. (HAI) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number Oca-12473) filed by John William Campbell.(HAI)(Additional attachment added on 6/1/2022: #1 Appendix) (HAI). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.