Crowell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Tonisha Crowell |
| Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
| 5:2022cv00276 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Northern District of Florida as case 3:22-cv-09193, filed on 07/05/2022. (LAB) |
| Filing 5 CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Florida. (LAB) |
Filing 4
ORDER transferring this case to the United States District Court, Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/30/2022. (GNB)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/17/2022. (RLK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Tonisha Crowell. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tonisha Crowell. (no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
